<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pet-food-score.eu/app.php/feed/topic/57" />

	<title>Pet Food Score - Petfood Advisor</title>
	<subtitle>Pet Food Social Netword</subtitle>
	<link href="https://pet-food-score.eu/index.php" />
	<updated>2026-05-26T16:27:30+00:00</updated>

	<author><name><![CDATA[Pet Food Score - Petfood Advisor]]></name></author>
	<id>https://pet-food-score.eu/app.php/feed/topic/57</id>

		<entry>
		<author><name><![CDATA[Frédéric Gonnot]]></name></author>
		<updated>2026-05-26T16:27:30+00:00</updated>

		<published>2026-05-26T16:27:30+00:00</published>
		<id>https://pet-food-score.eu/viewtopic.php?p=63#p63</id>
		<link href="https://pet-food-score.eu/viewtopic.php?p=63#p63"/>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Why create a petfood-score ABCDE if label data are unreliable?]]></title>

		
		<content type="html" xml:base="https://pet-food-score.eu/viewtopic.php?p=63#p63"><![CDATA[
Hello everyone,<br><br>I have a question about the petfood-score ABCDE concept. If the information on pet food labels is often incomplete, unclear, or even unreliable, why do we still base an ABCDE scoring system on these data?<br><br>Isn’t there a risk that the score itself will be biased or misleading if the underlying label information is not fully trustworthy? I would be interested to know how this issue is taken into account, and whether there are ways to improve the reliability of the score despite these limitations.<br><br>Thank you in advance for your insights and explanations.<br><br>Frédéric Gonnot<p>Statistics: Posted by <a href="https://pet-food-score.eu/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=59">Frédéric Gonnot</a> — Tue May 26, 2026 4:27 pm</p><hr />
]]></content>
	</entry>
	</feed>
